emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Missing entries for Perl in etags-regen-file-extensions -- okay for


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Missing entries for Perl in etags-regen-file-extensions -- okay for emacs-30?
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:19:39 +0300

> From: Corwin Brust <corwin@bru.st>
> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:07:59 -0500
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, spwhitton@spwhitton.name, 
> emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Hi Dmitry, all
> 
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 8:09 PM Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of other extensions, isn't ".a" usually a compiled library
> > rather than ASM source code? Also curious about ".t" for Scheme and
> > ".ml" for Lisp.
> >
> 
> FWIW, for or me .t is Perl (test scripts written in -and usually for
> testing- Perl)

It's a defcustom, so you can always adjust it to your personal needs
if the default value doesn't fit the bill.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]