Re: ELPA submission: mathjax.el

[Augusto Stoffel]

On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 07:23, Philip Kaludercic wrote:

> Also, do you know if you could support KaTeX as well?  AFAIK it is
> more lightweight (though the package name might be confusing in that
> case).

I must confess I made the choice for mathjax out of sheer ignorance of
KaTeX's existence.  Too bad I linked the package name with the backend
library. :-)

> I have tried QuickJS, but it didn't work either.  That being said, I am
> not a JS expert so what I do I know :)

Okay, this looks like an option if we wanted to turn the minified JS
into a binary executable, but this would then be platform-dependent.  I
guess it's not in the plans to make ELPA capable of distributing
binaries... or is it?