[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Semantic: update or remove?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Semantic: update or remove? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:30:21 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:15:00AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Psionic K <psionik@positron.solutions>
> > Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 09:40:34 +0900
> > Cc: Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> >
> > If a package can't find a maintainer and
> > survive on its own, it is simply not strong enough in the competitive
> > landscape to continue earning its
> > maintenance.
>
> That would mean to drop the ball on 75% of what we have in Emacs. So
> this suggestion is not useful.
I'm somewhere in those 75%. So thanks, Emacs! and thanks to all those
working hard on it.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, (continued)
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Po Lu, 2025/03/16
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Psionic K, 2025/03/16
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Po Lu, 2025/03/16
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Psionic K, 2025/03/17
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Po Lu, 2025/03/17
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Psionic K, 2025/03/17
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, tomas, 2025/03/17
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/17
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/17
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/03/17
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?,
tomas <=
- Re: Semantic: update or remove?, Jostein Kjønigsen, 2025/03/13