[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lispref/functions.texi,v
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lispref/functions.texi,v |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:19 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/emacs
Module name: emacs
Changes by: Richard M. Stallman <rms> 06/07/18 00:00:19
Index: functions.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lispref/functions.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- functions.texi 8 Jul 2006 18:09:12 -0000 1.37
+++ functions.texi 18 Jul 2006 00:00:19 -0000 1.38
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
practice).
We often identify functions with the symbols used to name them. For
-example, we often speak of ``the function @code{car}'', not
+example, we often speak of ``the function @code{car},'' not
distinguishing between the symbol @code{car} and the primitive
subr-object that is its function definition. For most purposes, the
distinction is not important.
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@
In Lisp, a function is a list that starts with @code{lambda}, a
byte-code function compiled from such a list, or alternatively a
-primitive subr-object; names are ``extra''. Although usually functions
+primitive subr-object; names are ``extra.'' Although usually functions
are defined with @code{defun} and given names at the same time, it is
occasionally more concise to use an explicit lambda expression---an
anonymous function. Such a list is valid wherever a function name is.