emacs-elpa-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[nongnu] elpa/bash-completion 7dc20e1b09 244/313: Use separate processes


From: ELPA Syncer
Subject: [nongnu] elpa/bash-completion 7dc20e1b09 244/313: Use separate processes in integration tests when it doesn't matter.
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 10:59:34 -0500 (EST)

branch: elpa/bash-completion
commit 7dc20e1b090dcdb4c96591dd6151376be950b14a
Author: Stephane Zermatten <szermatt@gmx.net>
Commit: Stephane Zermatten <szermatt@gmx.net>

    Use separate processes in integration tests when it doesn't matter.
    
    Integration tests seem flaky under Emacs 24 with use-separate-process
    set to nil.
---
 test/bash-completion-integration-test.el | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/bash-completion-integration-test.el 
b/test/bash-completion-integration-test.el
index 2c62d494aa..5871a751bd 100644
--- a/test/bash-completion-integration-test.el
+++ b/test/bash-completion-integration-test.el
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ for testing completion."
 (ert-deftest bash-completion-integration-space ()
   (bash-completion_test-with-shell-harness
    ""
-   nil
+   t ; bash-completion-use-separate-processes
    (bash-completion_test-test-spaces)))
 
 (ert-deftest bash-completion-integration-space-and-prog-completion ()
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ for testing completion."
              (not (zerop (length bash-completion_test-setup-completion))))
     (bash-completion_test-with-shell-harness
      (concat "source " bash-completion_test-setup-completion "\n")
-     nil
+     t ; bash-completion-use-separate-processes
      (bash-completion_test-test-spaces))))
   
 (defun bash-completion_test-test-spaces ()
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ for testing completion."
     "  COMPREPLY+=( \"ba${COMP_WORDS[$COMP_CWORD]}to\" )\n"
     "}\n"
     "complete -F _myprog myprog\n")
-   nil ; use-separate-process
+   t ; bash-completion-use-separate-processes
    ;; The default completion engine doesn't support replacing the word
    ;; to complete with candidates and will ignore all candidates, but
    ;; other completions engines do support it, so it's worth returning



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]