[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[elpa] externals/corfu 6f74b67552: HACK: Work around suspected Emacs 29
From: |
ELPA Syncer |
Subject: |
[elpa] externals/corfu 6f74b67552: HACK: Work around suspected Emacs 29 regression |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2022 15:57:25 -0500 (EST) |
branch: externals/corfu
commit 6f74b675521ca9731eec120da01dd9e6d56af449
Author: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
Commit: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
HACK: Work around suspected Emacs 29 regression
Is it possible that frames can have a dead root window?! Unfortunately I
don't
know how I managed to trigger the situation where (frame-live-p frame)
returned
t and (window-live-p (frame-root-window frame)) returned nil.
---
corfu.el | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/corfu.el b/corfu.el
index 3a7b82c03a..3fcee9c994 100644
--- a/corfu.el
+++ b/corfu.el
@@ -386,7 +386,11 @@ FRAME is the existing frame."
'resize-mode)))
(after-make-frame-functions)
(parent (window-frame)))
- (unless (and (frame-live-p frame) (eq (frame-parent frame) parent))
+ (unless (and (frame-live-p frame)
+ (eq (frame-parent frame) parent)
+ ;; XXX HACK: It seems the frame can be alive but have a dead
window?
+ ;; Is this a Emacs 29 regression?
+ (window-live-p (frame-root-window frame)))
(when frame (delete-frame frame))
(setq frame (make-frame
`((parent-frame . ,parent)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [elpa] externals/corfu 6f74b67552: HACK: Work around suspected Emacs 29 regression,
ELPA Syncer <=