[nongnu] elpa/meow 73f2dd2fce: fix(meow-next-thing): allow no include-syntax (#689)

[ELPA Syncer]

branch: elpa/meow
commit 73f2dd2fce8069c4ac4f6ae2a8afdda40450a7e4
Author: 45mg <45mm.cartridge421@slmail.me>
Commit: GitHub <noreply@github.com>

    fix(meow-next-thing): allow no include-syntax (#689)
    
    With the addition of `meow-next-thing-include-syntax` (13733e1),
    `meow--fix-thing-selection-mark` expects to find an entry in this alist
    corresponding to `thing`. This means that when the user defines their
    own `thing` and sets `meow-word-thing` or `meow-symbol-thing` to use it,
    they also need to add a corresponding entry to this alist.
    
    I'll admit that I don't understand why the `include-syntax` option
    needed to be introduced in `meow--fix-thing-selection-mark` (c0878ac).
    However, my own definitions of `meow-word-thing` and `meow-symbol-thing`
    worked fine without it. Based on that, my logic in this commit is that
    users shouldn't have to add to `meow-next-thing-include-syntax` unless
    they explicitly need the `skip-syntax-*` shrinking that was added to
    `meow--fix-thing-selection-mark`.
    
    Co-authored-by: 45mg <45mg@no.mail>
---
 meow-command.el | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meow-command.el b/meow-command.el
index 816eb97221..e6d35392fc 100644
--- a/meow-command.el
+++ b/meow-command.el
@@ -887,7 +887,9 @@ If N is negative, select to the beginning of the previous 
Nth thing instead."
     (meow--cancel-selection))
   (unless include-syntax
     (setq include-syntax
-          (let ((thing-include-syntax (alist-get thing 
meow-next-thing-include-syntax)))
+          (let ((thing-include-syntax
+                 (or (alist-get thing meow-next-thing-include-syntax)
+                     '("" ""))))
             (if (> n 0)
                 (car thing-include-syntax)
               (cadr thing-include-syntax)))))