[nongnu] elpa/helm bccc3f5867 3/3: Update comment

[ELPA Syncer]

branch: elpa/helm
commit bccc3f586792eebf3edad7958d37a73b0c5655fb
Author: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol@posteo.net>
Commit: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol@posteo.net>

    Update comment
---
 helm-lib.el | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/helm-lib.el b/helm-lib.el
index d8ad8280c1..194977b0cf 100644
--- a/helm-lib.el
+++ b/helm-lib.el
@@ -601,7 +601,9 @@ usable in all clauses to refer to EXPR.
     (let* ((clause1  (car clauses))
            (key      (car clause1))
            ;; Ensure dst* and guard* are not treated as special symbols when
-           ;; they are not followed by a sexp and nothing else.
+           ;; they are not followed by one sexp and nothing else, however if 
the
+           ;; following sexp is not meant to be evaluated but just compared we
+           ;; fail miserably, is it worth fixing it?
            (issexp   (and (consp (car-safe (cdr-safe key)))
                           (= (length key) 2)))
            (isguard  (and (eq 'guard* (car-safe key)) issexp))