|
From: | Carsten Dominik |
Subject: | Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09 |
Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:45:49 +0200 |
On Sep 19, 2007, at 2:49, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:Priority cycling is a bit odd. When I use M-n to cycle, it turns from #C-> nil-> #C-> nil, and M-p will be #A->nil->#A->nil.I did it like this on purpose, because I wanted S-up to immediately increase the priority.I would vote for something very simple: <S-up> increases priority, <S-down> decreases priority. <S-up> : nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B] [...] <S-down> : nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] [...]
How about this: S-up : nil -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] ... S-sown : nil -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] ... So the first keypress will really get you up/down from the default priority, and after that it is normal cycling. Maybe it is clearer in an example with 5 priorities, A..E, default C: S-up : nil -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#E] -> [#D] -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#E] ... Comments? - Carsten -- Carsten Dominik Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" Universiteit van Amsterdam Kruislaan 403 NL-1098SJ Amsterdam phone: +31 20 525 7477
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |