[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Set priority by S-<up> or S-<down> does not seem to work i
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Set priority by S-<up> or S-<down> does not seem to work in an indirect buffer in the first todo headline |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:58:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) |
Rainer Stengele <address@hidden> writes:
> as the subjct already says ... S-up does not do in the indirect buffer
> what it does in the "direct" buffer.
>
> Instead of a priority I get "Beginning of buffer". Is this a bug?
Yes.
`org-shiftup' calls `org-at-timestamp-p' (among others) which tries to
go backward while deciding if the cursor is on a timestamp.
This tiny patch provides a temporary workaround by being a bit more
liberal about the narrowed region:
diff -u /home/guerry/elisp/testing/org/org.el
/home/guerry/elisp/testing/bzg/org.el
--- /home/guerry/elisp/testing/org/org.el 2007-09-26 21:00:50.000000000
+0200
+++ /home/guerry/elisp/testing/bzg/org.el 2007-10-01 18:53:54.000000000
+0200
@@ -5370,7 +5370,7 @@
(if (< arg 0) (setq arg (+ level arg)))
(while (> (setq level (org-outline-level)) arg)
(outline-up-heading 1 t)))
- (setq beg (point)
+ (setq beg (1- (point))
heading (org-get-heading))
(org-end-of-subtree t) (setq end (point)))
(if (and (not arg)
Diff finished. Mon Oct 1 18:57:33 2007
But I guess Carsten will find a more general solution.
--
Bastien
- Re: [Orgmode] Set priority by S-<up> or S-<down> does not seem to work in an indirect buffer in the first todo headline,
Bastien <=