[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: editing repeat items
From: |
Richard G Riley |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: editing repeat items |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:02:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Carsten,
I will try to clarify.
I have a repeat task. Normally, for me, a repeat task will be for a "job
of work" to do at repeated intervals. It however is not the same job of
work. e.g
Every monday at 9am a status meeting. Or in my example ever tuesday a
pub quiz.
I want to be able to annotate each meeting separately so I see the weeks
specifics in the agenda.
e.g
1st April ** Pub Quiz <2008-03-25 21:30 +1w> This subject
8th April ** Pub Quiz <2008-03-25 21:30 +1w> Another subject
It could just be being too lazy but I would like the repeat task so that
an agenda for 6 months time has the Pub Quiz entry, but it probably wont
have a specific "subject" in this example.
I did try to add another active date to the original but that didnt work
e.g
<2008-04-08 Tue> subject1
<2008-04-12 Tue> subject2
I hope that is a little clearer,
rgds,
r.
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Richard G. Riley wrote:
>> Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev <at> googlemail.com> writes:
>>> Is there a facility to "unlink" a repeated item from its "repeat"
>>> parent
>>> e.g suppose I have
>>>
>>> ** Pub Quiz <2008-03-25 21:30 +1w>
>>>
>>> But open it on April 1st from the agenda for that week.
>>>
>>> In any particular one week I would like to add a certain tag or
>>> note to
>>> the task for that week only.
>>
>> With no direct solution/answer to this, could someone possibly
>> suggest another
>> approach?
>
> I think there was no answer because your question is not clear. I for
> one don't
> understand what exactly you want to do, and why you think it is not
> working.
> An entry like the above entry will show up in every week after the
> initial date,
> and you are free to add notes any way you like, at any time.
>
> So obviously I am missing something here.
>
> - Carsten