[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] footnote bug
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] footnote bug |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 22:53:21 -0700 |
Hi Carsten,
I figured that you had already optimized the agenda quite a lot and
that there probably wasn't much that could be done, so I suggested the
only thing that seemed like it might be fast and would not be too
brittle. I didn't realize the code would need to be rewritten.
For me, everything in the agenda is slow that requires refreshing or
creating a view. I don't know how to be more specific.
On 2009-03-30, Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> caching stuff for the agenda would mean rewriting the agenda code.
>
> Do you have more detailed pointers what operations exactly are slow?
> Maybe we can profile and improve these without resorting to cacheing.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
>
>> The following source produces the following output.
>>
>> ************* sorting speed
>>>> The agenda is wonderful for other stuff, but for me it is
>>>> not an editing mode per se. I have never been able to use
>>>> the agenda for full control over the org file, as some
>>>> people are able to do. For me (at least on my computer) it
>>>> is slow.
>>>
>>> What is "slow". Maybe we can improve things?
>>
>> You could use cached values for agenda files whose last
>> update time is earlier than the last agenda scan. That
>> could lead to significant speedups for people who have
>> several agenda files.[fn:15]
>>
>> [fn:15] It wouldn't help with people who have a single
>> agenda file, and it wouldn't help with people who very
>> frequently use all of their agenda files. For those use
>> cases, something much more complicated and brittle would
>> probably be necessary
>>
>>
>> Output:
>>
>> You could use cached values for agenda files whose last
>> update time is earlier than the last agenda scan. That
>> could lead to significant speedups for people who have
>> several agenda files.[1]
>> [fn:15] It wouldn't help with people who have a single
>> agenda file, and it wouldn't help with people who very
>> frequently use all of their agenda files. For those use
>> cases, something much more complicated and brittle would
>> probably be necessary
>> [1] [fn:15]
>>
>> --
>> Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early;
>> Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other
>> diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting
>> science. http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
>
--
Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early;
Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other
diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting
science. http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm
- Re: [Orgmode] footnote bug,
Samuel Wales <=