Re: [Orgmode] Re: here's a working version of org-generic

[Carsten Dominik]

On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:

> > > > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:59:14 -0400, Bernt Hansen  
> > > > > > <address@hidden> said:
>
> BH> Isn't the filename (org-generic.el) well, um, too generic?  If  
> it's
> BH> export-related wouldn't something like org-export-generic.el be  
> better?
> BH> (or maybe even org-export-tools.el? )
>
> Well, I was psuedo-modeling it after the existing file names.  Single
> dash, etc.  I hardly care about the name of the file ;-) Maybe
> org-carefree?  org-styleless?  org-everything?

Well, let's define a naming scheme for attempts to make other exporters.

Since org-export-latex no longer exists, lets indeed use names like

org-export-xxxxxxxxxxx.el

This wil leave the org-xxxxxx.el for other applications.

Thanks.

- Carsten

> --
> "In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
> and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode