[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode as a bug tracker.
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode as a bug tracker. |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:58:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.0.96 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
At Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:25:11 +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
[...]
> So I calculated what amount of plain text would require a replica of my
> Trac system: it's about 40 MB, with a few thousands tickets. I could
> partitionate this on four unequal parts, though, with the largest being
> 20 MB and 2000 tickets.
>
> Is this data volume too much for org?
>
I guess the question would be what you intend to do with the data.
For normal bug tracking, I guess inserting, searching and state (todo)
handling would be the main tasks. These operations would be either
O(n) or O(1), where n is the size of the file, I would imagine, so 20
MB might not be too bad?
I can't give you any specific data points that fall into that
magnitude but I can say that for files 1% that big, a slow netbook has
no problems even doing agenda views which are more expensive
operations than those mentioned above.
> Another nuisance is attached files. This requires an ad-hoc mechanism
> and I'm not sure I want them stored along with the source files.
Actually, I'm glad you brought this up. Since moving my org files to
be under version control (and boy does that make a difference to my
peace of mind!), I don't know how to deal with attachments.
Attachments, for me, are usually ephemeral and usually types of
documents I don't particularly like to deal with (typically MS Word or
PPT).
Any suggestions?
eric
Re: [Orgmode] Org-mode as a bug tracker., Bastien, 2009/07/18
[Orgmode] Re: OrgmodeOrg-mode as a bug tracker., Wes Hardaker, 2009/07/20