[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: Day workflow: need your opinion
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: Day workflow: need your opinion |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:11:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.0.93 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
User-agent: |
Rmail GNU emacs 23.0 on Slackware 13.0.0.0.0 |
At Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:46:40 +0100,
Leo wrote:
>
> On 2009-08-04 06:57 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > a) I doing some non urgent (planned) DBA tasks (call this project A)
> > b) someone calls me (interrupting Project A)
> > c) I am doing what urgency of b) is needed
> > d) when c) is finished, I get back to project A
> >
> > At my job, they often rules the "retro planning" concept which is
> > bloat. So how would you "manage" such situation in org-mode ?
>
> Let me give it a try.
>
> When I am at Task A but interupted for Task B, I will mark Task A with
> one of the todo-keywords (you can create one specific for interruption
> for example PAUSE).
>
> Then you need to review what is on your plate by C-c a t to decide your
> next action after Task B.
Already tried that but it failed for me. The less I do, the
better for me :D
Xavier
- [Orgmode] Day workflow: need your opinion, Xavier Maillard, 2009/08/04
- Re: [Orgmode] Day workflow: need your opinion, Vedang, 2009/08/04
- [Orgmode] Re: Day workflow: need your opinion, Leo, 2009/08/04
- [Orgmode] Re: Day workflow: need your opinion,
Xavier Maillard <=
- [Orgmode] Re: Day workflow: need your opinion, Benjamin Andresen, 2009/08/04
- RE: [Orgmode] Day workflow: need your opinion, Jonathan Arkell, 2009/08/04
- [Orgmode] Re: Day workflow: need your opinion, Bernt Hansen, 2009/08/04