[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs
From: |
Matt Lundin |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:19:17 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> I have made a test version of Org with the compatibility code
> for XEmacs and without some of the left-over compatibility
> code for Emacs 21.
>
> I would appreciate if some people could check out the
> `remove-compatibility-code' branch from repo.or.cz and report back
> if they experience any problems with Emacs 22, 23, and 24, either
> during compilation or while running.
No problems here so far. In fact, I received fewer warnings during
compilation.
GNU Emacs 24.0.50.7 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.0)
of 2010-04-15 on archdesk
- Matt
- [Orgmode] Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/14
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs,
Matt Lundin <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Sebastian Rose, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Bernt Hansen, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Bernt Hansen, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Bernt Hansen, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, RĂ©mi Vanicat, 2010/04/16
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs, Sebastian Rose, 2010/04/16