[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: Suggestions needed for handling "ideas"
From: |
Bernt Hansen |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: Suggestions needed for handling "ideas" |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:59:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Sébastien Vauban <address@hidden>
writes:
> I really am puzzled by using a "TODO state" for saying "this is a note".
>
> For me, a so-called TODO state is a circumstance (or a mode), so one
> transitional property on a cycle. That's something that evolves over time,
> such as:
>
> TODO -> NEXT -> STARTED -> WAITING -> DONE
>
> A NOTE does not belong to such cycles. It's just some kind of "property".
>
> I would be more inclined to view a NOTE "property" as a tag, but that does not
> satisfy me neither. Tags are for contexts, mainly resources we need to have at
> hand, or locations we need to be, or time ranges in which the action makes
> sense.
I think that's too narrow a view for tags. Tags should be whatever is
useful. It can be a context, or resources you need, or locations, or
anything else that is useful.
I use arbitrary tags to match items with an external tracking system -
and use the id of that system so I can match them easily. I also
use :NOTE: for notes. It works for my needs just fine. Tags are not
and should not be limited to context only. I also use tags for special
todo states... if I cancel a task I give it a CANCELLED tag too ... so
any subtask of the cancelled task is obviously cancelled and unavailable
to work on.
-Bernt