[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:14:45 -0700 |
Hi Dan,
On 2010-04-27, Dan Davison <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Another way to look at it is that this is an annotation mechanism. It
>> can be used for any type of file or buffer. This would include text,
>> websites (i.e. pointing to and annotating documents on the web),
>> dired, source code, org files, html source, etc.
>>
>> Modifying existing link syntax will be difficult, especially because
>> there might be additional features we need a year or two from now.
>> For maximum flexibility and simplicity, this might be a good first use
>> of extensible syntax.
>
> Hi Samuel,
>
> I'm not quite clear what you're referring to when you say "this" in the
> above sentences. Also, when you say "extensible syntax", are you
> referring to the existing link syntax, or to a proposed extension?
"this" means the idea in this thread.
Extensible syntax is a specific, documented proposal. I posted some
of the idea to this list a long time ago, as Carsten pointed out.
One application of extensible syntax is "this". :)
You can use extensible syntax for any feature you want. "this" is
links with special subfeatures that would be difficult to program into
ordinary link syntax.
Samuel
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>>
>> Samuel
>
--
Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for 25 years]
==========
Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, (continued)
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Mark Elston, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Eric S Fraga, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Eric Schulte, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Dan Davison, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Eric Schulte, 2010/04/27
- [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Giles Chamberlin, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Samuel Wales, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Dan Davison, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?, Carsten Dominik, 2010/04/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ?,
Samuel Wales <=