|
From: | Ian Barton |
Subject: | Re: [Orgmode] Re: What license for Worg? |
Date: | Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:14:25 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 |
On 04/08/10 06:36, Bastien wrote: > Or we might also consider CC0: > > http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ > > It looks way more simple to me. > > It also circumvents the problem of people having to sign the FSF papers > if the Org/Emacs manuals include part of the code they contributed to > Worg as examples. > > What people think? > Hi Bastien, The Software Freedom Law Centre has some good guidelines on licensing. Specificall you might want to look at: http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html#x1-120002.4 and http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2007/gpl-non-gpl-collaboration.html Ian.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |