[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:19:43 -0400 |
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Regarding Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not
> >> known; Nick Dokos <address@hidden> adds:
>
> > Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> And in this package I can't see your change,
> >> org-freemind is the same as in the package of yesterday
> >>
>
> > AFAIK, that's the latest *released* version: it's only updated for
> > releases. If you don't want to use git to get the latest development
> > version, you can get a tarball of it (or any version really) from
>
> Ok I was told differently on this list but ok.
I may be mistaken: I use git to update so I don't keep track of the
tarballs. But there are occasional hiccups and sometimes the tarballs
get out of sync, e.g. most recently at the end of September - see
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/31131
Currently I see both org-latest.zip and org-latest.tar.gz dated
2010-10-16 01:00 - and, btw, the top-level directory in both archives is
org-mode-web, which, according to Bastien in the above thread, is wrong
and should be fixed.
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/org-mode.git
>
> > Choose which snapshot you want and click the tar.gz or zip link at
> > the right end of the corresponding line (although I just pulled and
Overall, I think getting snapshot tarballs like this is more reliable;
but using git is much more efficient, both in terms of server resources
and in terms of efficient use of your time: if you are uploading a
tarball more often than every month, you owe it to yourself to use git.
Nick
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, (continued)
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Michael Sperber, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Carsten Dominik, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Uwe Brauer, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Carsten Dominik, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Uwe Brauer, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Carsten Dominik, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Uwe Brauer, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Nick Dokos, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Carsten Dominik, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Uwe Brauer, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Nick Dokos, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Giovanni Ridolfi, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Nick Dokos, 2010/10/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Carsten Dominik, 2010/10/25
- [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Jambunathan K, 2010/10/25
- [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Carsten Dominik, 2010/10/26
- [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Jambunathan K, 2010/10/26
- [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Bastien, 2010/10/27
- [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Bastien, 2010/10/27
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known, Bastien, 2010/10/27