[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items

[Carsten Dominik]

Hi Rainer, hi Bernt,

On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:

> Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
> > On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot...
> > >
> > > For toplevel clocktables which just sum up "all" I use ":maxlevel 0"
> > >
> > > The manual reads
> > >
> > > :maxlevel    Maximum level depth to which times are listed in the  
> > > table.
> > >
> > > which I misunderstood.
> > > I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not  
> > > added!
> > > But it looks like ":maxlevel 0" does not add everything up.
> >
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me.
> >
> > > Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds  
> > > up everything in the scope?
> > >
> > > BTW, the ":stepskip0" parameter does not seem to be included in  
> > > the manual.
> >
> > It is in the manual.
> >
> > - Carsten
> > > Rainer
>
>
> Carsten,
>
> maybe I misunderstood.
>
>
> 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get
>
> #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope ("file1.org" "file2") :timestamp  
> t :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend  "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>"
> Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07]
>
> | File              | L | Timestamp           | Headline       |      
> Time |        |        |
> |-------------------+---+---------------------+---------------- 
> +----------+--------+--------|
> |                   |   | Timestamp           | *Total time*   |  
> *327:51* |        |        |
> ...
>
>
>
> with :maxlevel 0 I get
>
>
> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope ("file1.org"  
> "file2") :timestamp t :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend   
> "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>"
> Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11]
>
> | File | L | Timestamp | Headline     | Time     |
> |------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
> |      |   | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* |
> |------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
> #+END:
>
>
> I would like to get the same results!
> Is ":maxlevel 0" intended to not include the sublevel clocks?

I think I have finally fixed this bug.  Please verify.

Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand.   
But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest  
version?  Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure  
clock tables deliver the same results?

Thanks!

- Carsten