[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct
From: |
Sébastien Vauban |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:20:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi Eric,
"Eric Schulte" wrote:
> "Eric Schulte" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> This would be useful for custom export of the proposed future babel
>> results block (which I promise I'll implement soon).
>
> An experimental patch implementing wrapping of results using a new
> "wrap" :results header argument is attached. Here is an example of its
> usage.
>
> ** introducing =wrap= header argument
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results wrap
> (mapcar (lambda (el) (list el (+ 1 (* el el)))) (number-sequence 0 10))
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> #+BEGIN_RESULT
> | 0 | 1 |
> | 1 | 2 |
> | 2 | 5 |
> | 3 | 10 |
> | 4 | 17 |
> | 5 | 26 |
> | 6 | 37 |
> | 7 | 50 |
> | 8 | 65 |
> | 9 | 82 |
> | 10 | 101 |
> #+END_RESULT
>
>
> now indented
> - first
> - second
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results wrap
> "something else"
> #+end_src
>
>
> #+results:
> #+BEGIN_RESULT
> : something else
> #+END_RESULT
>
>
>
> I haven't applied it directly to the repository because I fear it could
> have negative effects on the wrapping of results in HTML and LaTeX
> blocks, so if any brave souls could try this out over the next day or
> two and let me know how it works I'd then feel much more comfortable
> about dropping it into the core.
Waoouwww, that was quick!
I'll patch my system and test it this evening. Thank you *very much*...
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sébastien Vauban
- [Orgmode] [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Orgmode] [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Christian Moe, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Thomas S. Dye, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Thomas S. Dye, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Eric Schulte, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Eric Schulte, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct,
Sébastien Vauban <=
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Eric Schulte, 2010/11/22
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/23
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Christian Moe, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Dan Davison, 2010/11/20
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/20
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Dan Davison, 2010/11/21
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/22