[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Difficult to follow code execution in HTML exp
From: |
Eric Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Difficult to follow code execution in HTML exported file |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:23:52 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Sébastien Vauban <address@hidden> writes:
>> I imagine that such a change would meet with some resistance, at least I
>> know I would not want all of my table names exported by default.
>
> You name it... "by default", meaning such a behavior should be "switchable":
> on or off.
>
>
>> Is there a reason you don't just add the table name manually? e.g.
>>
>> Numbers-1
>> #+tblname: numbers-1
>> | 1 |
>> | 2 |
>> | 45 |
>> | test |
>> | 3.141592 |
>
> I'm not really enthousiast about solutions that would be manual.
>
> On the contrary, even if table names were always exported, the name can easily
> disappear from your documents with just a (very) little bit of CSS or LaTeX
> code. In CSS, just apply "display: none" on the DIV, and you're done. I don't
> really understand the resistance you're talking about, then.
>
> To sum up, if the info is there, it's really easy to remove it (even
> automatically!). If it's not there, it's quite a tedious task to add it
> (manually)...
>
> Do you understand the need I'm trying to express?
>
Yes, I understand the need you express and I agree that this would be a
useful addition to the export engine. I'm not sure how the export or
table names (and probably other types of names including results and
maybe other Org-mode comments) would be toggled on and off however, but
perhaps someone better acquainted with the export engine than myself
would know.
Best -- Eric
>
> Best regards,
> Seb