[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Property inheritance for MAIL_FMT, MAIL_TO, MAIL_CC an
From: |
Eric Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Property inheritance for MAIL_FMT, MAIL_TO, MAIL_CC and MAIL_BCC |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 06:32:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Seb,
Good idea, I've just placed this behind a new
`org-mime-use-property-inheritance' variable which will default to nil.
I was originally going to have this variable default to t, but the idea
of causing people to accidentally add unintended recipients to emails is
too scary.
Thanks for the suggestion -- Eric
Sébastien Vauban <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Eric and Niels,
>
> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> niels giesen <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Please see the patch below, it adds property inheritance for all
>>> MAIL_* properties, based on the value of
>>> `org-use-property-inheritance'.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, and for the motivating usage example. -- Eric
>
> If I understand correctly, one must enable =org-use-property-inheritance= for
> the above to be in effect.
>
> Though, this is discouraged in the doc:
>
> ,----
> | org-use-property-inheritance is a variable defined in `org.el'.
> | Its value is nil
> |
> | Documentation:
> | Non-nil means properties apply also for sublevels.
> |
> | This setting is chiefly used during property searches. Turning it on
> can
> | cause significant overhead when doing a search, which is why it is not
> | on by default.
> `----
>
> Couldn't we either:
>
> - consider the MAIL_* properties as the *_ALL ones that well have inheritance
> enabled by default?
>
> ,----
> | However, note that some special properties use inheritance under special
> | circumstances (not in searches). Examples are CATEGORY, ARCHIVE,
> COLUMNS,
> | and the properties ending in "_ALL" when they are used as descriptor
> | for valid values of a property.
> `----
>
> - have a setting allowing for the inheritance of just these special
> properties, as an extra, in order not to penalize too much the searches?
>
> Best regards,
> Seb