[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:09:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:
>
> I've just pushed up an implementation for inline call blocks, the new
> syntax is described in the documentation but a simple example is below.
>
> #+source: square
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var it=0
> (* it it)
> #+end_src
>
> Here is a call_square(it=4) stuck in the middle of some prose.
>
> Please let me know how it works and if you have any problems or
> recommendations.
>
> Cheers -- Eric
Eric,
this was working on Friday but seems to have stopped working for me now
completely. For instance, your snippet above exports as
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\lstset{language=Lisp}
\begin{lstlisting}
(* it it)
\end{lstlisting}
Here is a call$_{\mathrm{square}}$(it=4) stuck in the middle of some prose.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I do not believe I have changed anything in my settings...
I do note from the git log that you have made quite a few changes. Has
some setting crept in that I need to configure?
Also, I note from the comments that you expect the inline call to be
whitespace delimited. I haven't tested this but, just in case, could I
request that the delimiting be either whitespace or punctuation? There
are cases where I would like the inline evaluation to be at the end of a
sentence, for instance, or even something like:
25^2=call_square(it=25)
Thanks,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.461.g6d18)
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, (continued)
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/26
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/26
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results,
Eric S Fraga <=
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/27
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/29
Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Juan Pechiar, 2011/06/22