[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:10:52 -0400 |
Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello Karl,
>
> Karl Voit <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Sorry when I disagree for one case:
> >
> > When I change each entry in my test data using «C-c .» and clicking
> > on 1st of July ...
> >
> > ,----[ test data ]
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue -1d>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w -1d>
> > `----
> >
> > ... I end up having this:
> >
> > ,----[ result ]
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri +1w>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> > `----
> >
> > In the last case, the repeater gets lost :-(
>
> I cannot reproduce this.
>
I can - but after earlier today, I'm not sure I trust my eyes: anybody else?
Org-mode version 7.5 (baseline.387.gf9cc.dirty)
(the dirty part is because of some Makefile experiments, nothing to do with
timestamps).
> Note that if you use the warning _before_ the repeater,
> then it gets losts:
>
> <2011-06-28 Tue -1d +1w>
That's not the problem - check the "before" state of the third of Karl's
examples.
>
> That because the warning should always be _after_ the repeater:
>
> See section 8.3.2 "Repeated tasks" in the manual
>
> "the repeater should come first and the warning period last:
> `DEADLINE: <2005-10-01 Sat +1m -3d>'."
>
Nick
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, (continued)
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Nick Dokos, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Nick Dokos, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Nick Dokos, 2011/06/28
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bastien, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Nick Dokos, 2011/06/29
- Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Karl Voit, 2011/06/29
Re: [O] org-time-stamp loses repeater interval, Bernt Hansen, 2011/06/24