[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
From: |
MidLifeXis at PerlMonks |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:40:51 -0700 (PDT) |
I am still getting prompted with the 'Evaluate this text code block
(file-version) on your system?' message.
What is your value of org-confirm-babel-evaluate set to? Mine is set as the
default, 't. According to the docs, this is the more secure setting.
I updated no more than two weeks ago. I will refresh my org-mode setup over
the weekend and see if that takes care of it.
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Schulte <address@hidden>
To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks <address@hidden>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
Yes, the second example I gave (shown immediately below) requires no
execution of code.
#+begin_src text :tangle yes
<<file-version()>>.
#+end_src
#+results: file-version
: 1.2.3.4
Best -- Eric
MidLifeXis at PerlMonks <address@hidden> writes:
> Is there an example of this that does not use something like elisp, R, perl,
> python, shell, or some other process that requires either allowing all blocks
> to execute without prompting, or prompting for authority to run the block
> every time the file is tangled?
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eric Schulte <address@hidden>
> To: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks <address@hidden>
> Cc: emacs-orgmode <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [O] Regression bug in tangle/weave
>
> Hi,
>
> Indeed this example below no longer works, however I believe the new
> behavior is both desired and permanent. I'll explain and include an
> option for how your example could be restructured to work with the new
> code.
>
> We ran into problems automatically removing trailing newlines from code
> block bodies as in some languages (looking at you Python and Haskell)
> things like trailing newlines are of syntactic importance. In your
> example this behavior results in the insertion of newlines after
> file-name and file-version. Babel is careful to preserve line prefixes
> when expanding references in comments, so it then reproduces the
>
> # Generated from
>
> portion of that line for every line of the expanded noweb references.
>
> I would suggest the following alternatives, either using a data
> references in stead of a code block reference as in the file-version
> example below, or using an evaluated code block as in the file-name
> example below. Hope this helps.
>
> Best -- Eric
>
>
>
> MidLifeXis at PerlMonks <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> It appears that there may be a regression problem with the current
>> tangle/weave process. I used to be able to have a noweb section for
>> the name of the file, another for the version of the file, and then
>> have an autogenerated header section that included those two pieces of
>> information on a single line. Following is an org file snippet of my
>> bug description.
>>
>>
>> * Bugs
>> ** SOMEDAY org-mode bug with tangle and newlines :BUG:
>> :PROPERTIES:
>> :created: [2011-06-30 Thu 10:00]
>> :ID: e4c992b5-4d35-443b-b34a-0fbda7c66aea
>> :END:
>> :LOGBOOK:
>> - Added on [2011-06-30 Thu 10:00]
>> :END:
>> [2011-06-30 Thu]
>>
>> A regression bug has surfaced in org-mode with the tangle/weave
>> process mangling the following setup:
>>
>> #+begin_src perl :noweb yes :tangle testoutput.pl :shebang #!perl
>> # <<generated-from>>
>> print "Hello world\n";
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+srcname: generated-from
>> #+begin_src text :noweb yes
>> Generated from <<file-name>> version <<file-version>>.
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+srcname: file-name
>> #+begin_src text :noweb yes
>> ATestFile.org
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+srcname: file-version
>> #+begin_src text :noweb yes
>> 1.2.3.4
>> #+end_src
>>
>> The last it worked* was sometime in the early 7.4 timeframe. If I
>> get some time, I may do a bisect on it, although others are welcome
>> to do the work required. Timeframe is based on memory, not
>> actual checking, so first a bisect needs to be done to find where
>> it last worked.
>>
>>
>> *** Actual output
>>
>> #+begin_src perl
>> #!perl
>>
>> # Generated from ATestFile.org
>> # Generated from version 1.2.3.4
>> # Generated from <<file-name>> version .
>> #
>> print "Hello world\n";
>> #+end_src
>>
>> *** Expected output (or at least similar)
>>
>> #+begin_src perl
>> #!perl
>>
>> # Generated from ATestFile.org version 1.2.3.4.
>>
>> print "Hello world\n";
>> #+end_src
>>
>> * End of org file
>>
>>
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/