[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-a
|
From: |
Matthew Sauer |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:20:09 -0500 |
Bastien,
What I am hearing is that an API that allows caching could be built
that could benefit extensions and then once that is deemed stable
enough an optional or separate track would be rebuilding the Agenda as
it is today into that API?
Matt
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Masashi,
>
> SAKURAI Masashi <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'm sure that the caching mechanism is useful, but I'm not sure that
>> we should do it with paying the large cost of rewrite whole codes.
>
> FWIW, this is a two separate steps process: 1) write a usable cache,
> then 2) re-implement (parts of) the agenda by using it.
>
> I think (1) could be interesting /per-se/ and if it helps calfw, then
> it's even more interesting.
>
> 2 cents,
>
> --
> Bastien
>
>
- [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), SAKURAI Masashi, 2011/07/10
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), Bastien, 2011/07/12
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), SAKURAI Masashi, 2011/07/16
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), SAKURAI Masashi, 2011/07/20
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), Rasmus, 2011/07/20
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda:, Giovanni Ridolfi, 2011/07/20
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), SAKURAI Masashi, 2011/07/21
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), Bastien, 2011/07/21
- Re: [O] New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view of the org-agenda), SAKURAI Masashi, 2011/07/22