Re: [O] CLOCKTABLE multiply time expended by hourly rate?

[Daniel E . Doherty]

Thanks, Jonathan.  That was it.  I updated to 7.6 and now all is well.


At Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:34:15 -0400,
Jonathan Leech-Pepin wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Which version of Org are you using?
> 
> 7.6 (archive from org) with very few org-related customizations 
> (Emacs-Starter-Kit
> along with one or two small changes) behaved properly.
> 
> I took your original table and updated the formulas and the values behaved as 
> whole
> numbers rather than fractions
> 
> | Headline                                                              | 
> Time    |
>        |      |       |
> |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-------+------+-------
> |
> | *Total time*                                                          | 
> *28:09* |
>        |      |     0 |
> |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------+---------+-------+------+-------
> |
> | Lawsuit for Debt Against Rose Funding, LLC (1016-cv18431)             | 
> 28:09   |
>        |      |     0 |
> | Activities                                                            |     
>     |
> 28:09 |      |     0 |
> | DONE Activity Log                                                     |     
>     |
>        | 0:05 |   250 |
> | DONE Draft Complaint for Damages                                      |     
>     |
>        | 5:40 | 17000 |
> | DONE Meet with Kevin Jones and Elizabeth Bennett re Complaint         |     
>     |
>        | 0:32 |  1600 |
> | DONE [#A] Motion for Appointment of Private Process Server            |     
>     |
>        | 1:24 |  4200 |
> | DONE [#A] File Affidavit of Service with Court                        |     
>     |
>        | 0:25 |  1250 |
> | [2010-07-27 Tue 11:16] Phone call from Mark Sheister                  |     
>     |
>        | 0:11 |   550 |
> | Research regarding compulsory counterclaim, res judicata              |     
>     |
>        | 1:23 |  4150 |
> | Work on brief in opposition to motion to dismiss.                     |     
>     |
>        | 3:03 |  9150 |
> | Prepared for Hearing                                                  |     
>     |
>        | 0:24 |  1200 |
> | Hearing on Case Status (Div 25:7th Flr) <2010-10-19 Tue 09:00>        |     
>     |
>        | 0:30 |  1500 |
> | Hearing on Motion to Dismiss <2010-11-30 Tue 09:00>                   |     
>     |
>        | 1:15 |  3750 |
> | Hearing on Motion to Dismiss <2010-12-21 Tue 09:00>                   |     
>     |
>        | 1:09 |  3450 |
> | Status Hearing <2011-01-25 Tue 09:00>                                 |     
>     |
>        | 1:31 |  4550 |
> | Status Hearing <2011-04-26 Tue 09:00>                                 |     
>     |
>        | 1:42 |  5100 |
> | Called Kevin [[bbdb:Stacy]].  Left voicemail to call re settlement offer. |
>          |       | 0:04 |   200 |
> | DONE Call [[bbdb:Sheister]] with counter offer.                           |
>          |       | 0:06 |   300 |
> | [#B] Draft Interrogatories for Rose, Swords                           |     
>     |
>        | 4:48 | 14400 |
> | Argo Status Hearing <2011-06-28 Tue 09:00>                            |     
>     |
>        | 1:09 |  3450 |
> | Letter of Discovery Deficiencies                                      |     
>     |
>        | 2:48 |  8400 |
> #+TBLFM: $5=$4*50;Df2
> 
> Not sure where the issue might be in your case, however the formula should 
> behave
> correctly.
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:55, Daniel E. Doherty <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>     At Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:37:55 +0200,
>     Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
>     >
>     > Daniel E. Doherty <address@hidden> writes:
>     >
>     > > That's certainly thinking outside the box, but I don't think it
>     > > works.
>     >
>     > Actually, Daniel you don't have to *think*, you've to demonstrate
>     > that it works or that it doesn't /tertium non datur/.
>     >
>     > > In your example, 1:09 represents 1/9th in calc's fraction mode,
>     > > not 1+9/60 which it would have to in order to compute with it.
>     > Not with GNU/Emacs 23.3 calc.
>     >
>     > If you bill 50 per 1 hour, you bill
>     >
>     > (/ 50 60.0 ) is 0.83 per minute.
>    
>     Agreed.
>    
>     >
>     > If you bill 1 hour + 9 minutes it is 69 minutes
>     >
>     > (* 0.83 69) 57.269999999999996  = 57.27
>     >
>     > isn't it ?
>     >
>    
>     It is.
>    
>     > And the fifth column in my table (see below) does compute 57.27 or not?
>     >
>    
>     Not.  At least when I do it.  Here's what I get after recalcing your 
> example.
>    
>     | Argo Status Hearing <2011-06-28 Tue 09:00> |   |   | 1:09 | 0.09 |
>     | Letter of Discovery Deficiencies           |   |   | 2:48 | 0.03 |
>     #+TBLFM: $5=$4*0.83;Df2
>    
>     Maybe I have a different mode setting or something.  You seem to have
>     the $4, or 1:09, being interpreted as 69, but I have it being
>     interpreted as a calc fraction, i.e., 1/9 = 0.11111111.  So 0.83 *
>     0.111111 gives me 0.9259, which rounds to 0.9.
>    
>     >    You may say: "Ah but this is only one example, you've been lucky!"
>     >
>    
>     I would.
>    
>     >  I reply, what about the second line?
>     >
>     > (* (+ 120 48) 0.83) = 139.44
>     >
>     > Calc is *really* smart, isn't it?
>    
>     Undoubtedly.  Apart from Org, my favorite features of Emacs.  I'm
>     waiting for vi to duplicate that functionality.
>    
>     Thanks for taking the time to look at this.
>    
>     >
>     > cheers,
>     > Giovanni
>     >
>     > >
>     > > Regards,
>     > >
>     > > At Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:07:28 +0200,
>     > > Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
>     > >>
>     > >> Daniel E. Doherty <address@hidden> writes:
>     > >>
>     > >> > Hi all,
>     > >> >
>     > >> > I am trying to use orgmode to bill for time.  My idea is to add a 
> column
>     > >> > that multiplies the elapsed time column by an hourly rate.
>     > >>
>     > >> what about using a minute rate?
>     > >>
>     > >> (/ 50 60.0) 0.83 so:
>     > >>
>     > >> | Argo Status Hearing <2011-06-28 Tue 09:00> |   |   | 1:09 |  57.27 
> |
>     > >> | Letter of Discovery Deficiencies           |   |   | 2:48 | 139.44 
> |
>     > >> #+TBLFM: $5=$4*0.83;Df2
>     > >>
>     > >>
> 
>