[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] BUG: example/src blocks and latex export
From: |
Eric Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: [O] BUG: example/src blocks and latex export |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:30:48 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > * foo
>> >
>> > Verbiage to begin the paragraph
>> > #+begin_src shell
>> > get-config.py var section [section ...]
>> > #+end_src
>> > and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
>> >
>> > * bar
>> >
>> > Verbiage to begin the paragraph
>> > #+begin_example
>> > get-config.py var section [section ...]
>> > #+end_example
>> > and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
>>
>> I tested your patch with the example above and I get this:
>>
>> ,----
>> | Verbiage to begin the paragraph
>> |
>> | \lstset{language=shell}
>> | \begin{lstlisting}
>> | get-config.py var section [section ...]
>> | \end{lstlisting}
>> |
>> | and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
>> | \section*{bar}
>> | \label{sec-2}
>> |
>> |
>> | Verbiage to begin the paragraph
>> |
>> | \begin{verbatim}
>> | get-config.py var section [section ...]
>> | \end{verbatim}
>> | and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
>> `----
>>
>> It looks better than the current export (less white lines) but still
>> has a problem with the first "and verbiage..." being indented.
>>
>> Is this intentional? Or do you want the same behavior for #+begin_src
>> and #+begin_example?
>>
>> In overall, I think number of white lines should be the same in the Org
>> source file and in the LaTeX exported file, so a patch here is welcome.
>> But maybe I misunderstood something in Eric's reply.
>>
>
> So here's another patch to get rid of some more newlines, these ones after
> a listings or minted environment. I tried both with the previously posted file
> and setting org-export-latex-listings to t or 'minted. AFAICT, it works as it
> should and should not break anything else, but... This is to be applied on top
> of the previous one (and it's still very much a trial balloon).
>
This seems like a logical extension of the previous patch, I've just
applied this as well.
Thanks Again -- Eric
>
> BTW, the defcustom of org-export-latex-listings seems to be outdated:
> custom thinks it's a boolean, but it can now take at least one more value
> (minted - see the docstring).
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> From 5337cbb0669c6b05170190ec1e5751bdcf132d87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nick Dokos <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:36:50 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Get rid of gratuitous newline after listing/minted
> environment.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Dokos <address@hidden>
> ---
> lisp/org-exp.el | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
> index a2a2fb3..f795fbd 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-exp.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-exp.el
> @@ -2689,11 +2689,11 @@ INDENT was the original indentation of the block."
> (format "\\begin{%s}\n%s\\end{%s}\n"
> custom-environment rtn custom-environment))
> (listings-p
> - (format "\\begin{%s}\n%s\\end{%s}\n"
> + (format "\\begin{%s}\n%s\\end{%s}"
> "lstlisting" rtn "lstlisting"))
> (minted-p
> (format
> - "\\begin{minted}[%s]{%s}\n%s\\end{minted}\n"
> + "\\begin{minted}[%s]{%s}\n%s\\end{minted}"
> (mapconcat #'make-option-string
> org-export-latex-minted-options ",")
> backend-lang rtn)))))))
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/