[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Hide drawers in indirect buffers?
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Hide drawers in indirect buffers? |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:26:11 +0200 |
On 4.10.2011, at 17:22, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
> on Tue Oct 04 2011, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> on Sat Oct 01 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from
>>>> the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open. I'd prefer it if
>>>> they were closed by default. Is there a way to do that?
>>>
>>> To follow up my own post...
>>>
>>> This is actually very surprising, because the entry shows up in a state
>>> that can't be reached by tabbing on its headline, with all the drawers
>>> open. If you run (org-show-entry) in the indirect buffer it goes into a
>>> less-noisy configuration.
>>
>> This is indeed a bug, fixed now.
>
> Thanks. So, just for my education, can you explain why running
> `org-cycle-hook 'all' is superior to just `org-show-entry' (which was my
> workaround)?
Because this would also show, for example, archived trees etc.
- Carsten
>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com