[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lin
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:32:23 -0400 |
Christian Moe <address@hidden> wrote:
> Whoa -- before this gets more confusing:
>
> Eric, did you push up a (new, or at least so far undocumented in the
> manual) syntax involving a #+PROPERTIES line, as Nick and Sebastien
> seem to understand you?
>
> Or was #+PROPERTIES just a typo, and you mean using the #+PROPERTY
> line or :PROPERTIES: drawer, as provided in the manual?
>
Here's the commit log (I think it reflects the code changes faithfully):
,----
| commit 04a978fde525a442f9de14d1a67783edd5c9cb78
| Author: Eric Schulte <address@hidden>
| Date: Thu Oct 20 13:31:20 2011 -0600
|
| removing #+BABEL: lines in favor of general #+PROPERTIES: lines
|
| * lisp/ob.el (org-babel-params-from-buffer): Removing #+BABEL: lines
| in favor of general #+PROPERTIES: lines.
|
| * doc/org.texi (Buffer-wide header arguments): Removing documentation
| of the defunct #+BABEL: structure.
`----
So #+BABEL was traded for #+PROPERTIES.
Nick
> Yours,
> Christian
>
> (lamenting the demise of the #+BABEL header I'd just recently started
> to use)
>
>
>
> On 10/20/11 10:12 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> > Nick Dokos<address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> Eric Schulte<address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have just pushed up a change to the Org-mode git repository which
> >>> removes support for #+BABEL lines. Please use the more general
> >>> #+PROPERTIES lines instead.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Coming late to the dance - sorry. I think that's very confusing.
> >> "Property" is an overloaded term in org: we now have the :PROPERTIES:
> >> drawer, the #+PROPERTY line and the #+PROPERTIES line (singular and
> >> plural forms are already pretty bad).
> >
> > Do the #+PROPERTY and #+PROPERTIES lines have different semantics?
> >
> >> Also, there is the general concept of properties (the stuff that the
> >> property API applies to).
> >>
> >> Unless there is an underlying unity of which I'm unaware, I'd strongly
> >> suggest another term - perhaps CODE_BLOCK_HEADER_ARGUMENTS (plus
> >> an easy-template for easy insertion).
> >>
> >
> > Code blocks already piggy-back off of subtree properties pulling their
> > header arguments out of the properties specified on the subtree level.
> > Given that header arguments and properties are already thus interleaved
> > I believe that properties should be used on the file-wide level as well,
> > rather than introducing another synonymous keyword which adds no new
> > functionality.
> >
> > Does that make sense?
> >
> > Best -- Eric
> >
>
>
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, (continued)
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Christian Moe, 2011/10/21
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira, 2011/10/21
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/10/22
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/22
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira, 2011/10/24
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Samuel Wales, 2011/10/31
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Samuel Wales, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Christian Moe, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines,
Nick Dokos <=