[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
From: |
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:39:33 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.0 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
Does org have TAB completion in "call lines" for names of blocks that can
be called? Using "srcname" for blocks of code could make things easier but
if this is not the case then I "name" is just fine.
--
Darlan
At Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:37:13 +0100,
Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Daniel Bausch <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
> >> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
> >> named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
> >
> > what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
> >
> > That a table or list contains data is obvious. The only thing, the
> > additional
> > line is for, is to "name" it. That a source block contains source is also
> > obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate
> > the
> > "src"-part?
> >
> > Daniel
>
> I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but...
>
> I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2].
>
> I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and
> results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used
> for [3]. In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname...
>
> --
> : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1
> : using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5)
>
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, (continued)
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric S Fraga, 2011/10/24
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords,
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thorsten, 2011/10/21
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, suvayu ali, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Suvayu Ali, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/20
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20