[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Getting rid of split frame with org-capture
From: |
Tom Prince |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Getting rid of split frame with org-capture |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:48:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:13:11 -0500, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
> Not worth the bother IMO[fn:1], but if you wish to implement it and submit
> a patch, I'd be happy to review it.
>
> Nick
>
> Footnotes:
>
> [fn:1] Remember, capture is supposed to be as unobtrusive as possible:
> you just want to squirrel away something for future
> reference. Bells and whistles (which, IMO, this change would be)
> are not the point: you want to get in, record the data and get
> out and back to work as fast as possible. Popping up frames slows
> things down but more importantly jolts you away from what you
> were doing. At least, it would me (I think): that's why I don't
> think it's worth it, but you may very well disagree.
It isn't worth *if* capture is invoked from emacs. If capture is invoked
from org-protocol in firefox, then there might not even be a emacs frame
visible.
1) If I don't pass -c to emacsclient, then I need to search all my
workspaces to find where emacs decided to put the capture frame
2) If I pass do pass -c to emacsclient, then I need to close the frame
afterwards. And more significantly, I need to close the empty frame
when I use store-link instead. (I could work around this by using
seperate protocols for for each)
Tom
Re: [O] Getting rid of split frame with org-capture, Nick Dokos, 2011/11/13