[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Standardized code block syntax and Property Accumulation merged
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Standardized code block syntax and Property Accumulation merged into Master |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:09:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
> The standard-code-block-syntax branch has been merged into the master
> branch of the git repository. This brings two much discussed changes to
> Org-mode, first a standard set of keywords for code blocks and second
> the ability to accumulate properties by appending a "+" to the end of
> the property name. For much more information on both of these changes
> see the relevant commits [1] and [2] respectively. A function for
> updating existing Org-mode files to use the new standardized code block
> keywords is inline below [3], additionally I've updated my collection of
> Org-mode code block scraps [4].
Nice to see it's finally in!
However, I have to report a _tiny_ feature of applying your function:
> [3] Function to update Org-mode buffers to use the new code block syntax.
> (defun update-org-buffer ()
> "Update an Org-mode buffer to the new data, code block and call line
> syntax."
> (interactive)
> (save-excursion
> (flet ((to-re (lst) (concat "^[ \t]*#\\+" (regexp-opt lst t)
> "\\(\\[\\([[:alnum:]]+\\)\\]\\)?\\:[
> \t]*"))
> (update (re new)
> (goto-char (point-min))
> (while (re-search-forward re nil t)
> (replace-match new nil nil nil 1))))
> (let ((old-re (to-re '("RESULTS" "DATA" "SRCNAME" "SOURCE")))
> (lob-re (to-re '("LOB")))
> (case-fold-search t))
> (update old-re "name")
> (update lob-re "call")))))
When run on a buffer containing:
#+property: var foo=1
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
foo
#+end_src
#+results:
: 1
it will translate `#+results' to `#+name':
#+property: var foo=1
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
foo
#+end_src
#+name:
: 1
Further evaluations of that *un-named* code block will leave the `#+name'
line.
To get back the expected `#+results' line, you have to manually remove that
results line, and re-evaluate the code block.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban