[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during
From: |
Torsten Anders |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during Org export |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:01:04 +0000 |
Dear Eric,
Sorry for the noise, it works fine.
> see the manual for valid values for the eval header argument.
I actually did, but only the online version so far. Of course, for such changes
I had to check the doc sources...
Anyway, thanks a lot!!
Best wishes,
Torsten
On 28 Nov 2011, at 07:13, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Hi Torsten,
>
> Change "non-export" to "no-export", see the manual for valid values for
> the eval header argument.
>
> Best -- Eric
>
> Torsten Anders <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Dear Eric,
>>
>> Apologies for my late response (too much teaching and admin in this new job
>> :-P). Thanks a lot again for kingly adding the "eval" header
>> argument "non-export". From what I understand in your message this would be
>> exactly what I was looking for (allow interactive
>> evaluation, but inhibit code block evaluation during export). I just pulled
>> the latest org sources and tested your addition.
>>
>> Unfortunately, even when using this header argument value, code blocks in
>> both Lilypond and Fomus are still executed when the buffer is exported to
>> either PDF (via Latex) or HTML.
>>
>> Below is a test that I understood should not execute during export. Am I
>> missing something?
>>
>>
>> #+begin_src fomus :eval non-export :results silent :file fomus-test.ly
>> time 1 dur 1 pitch 60;
>> #+end_src
>> [[file:fomus-test.pdf]]
>>
>> Thanks a lot again!
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Torsten
>>
>>
>> On 22 Nov 2011, at 01:23, Eric Schulte wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Torsten,
>>>
>>> Torsten Anders <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Dear Sebastien and Eric,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for your kind replies. However, this is not yet quite what I
>>>> am after.
>>>>
>>>> I want to be able to manually execute each code block, but not
>>>> automatically whenever the whole document is rendered. So, I would
>>>> always switch on/off "eval never". Hm...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've just pushed up a patch which adds a new option to the "eval" header
>>> argument. Setting eval to "non-export" will now allow interactive
>>> evaluation, but will inhibit code block evaluation during export. This
>>> should address your need as I understand it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will try out the ":cache" header argument. However, again this does
>>>> not work so well, because for the languages I am using the :file
>>>> argument does not work very well (I have to manually change
>>>> extensions, so I include the resulting file links by hand anyway and
>>>> set :results to silent.
>>>>
>>>> So, I it sounds like few org-babel users is really running larger
>>>> applications in their code blocks which can delay the export of the
>>>> whole document considerably.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would not jump to that conclusion. I have used babel code blocks to
>>> cache the results of very long running results, however between the
>>> :cache header argument and the ability to manually disassociate
>>> generated results from code blocks I have not had any problems
>>> inhibiting execution during export.
>>>
>>> Best -- Eric
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, thanks a lot for your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>> Torsten
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eric Schulte
>>> http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/
>>
>
> --
> Eric Schulte
> http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/