Re: [O] :noweb header argument

[Andreas Leha]

"Sebastien Vauban"
<address@hidden> writes:

[...]

>> I think it might be good to have a parameter that expands noweb
>> references on evaluation and tangling, but leaves them alone during
>> export.  This way the code block would be fully functional, but wouldn't
>> duplicate code during export (when the noweb references are to other
>> code blocks in the same document).
>
> I'd find that interesting as well, but then the names of the code blocks must
> be visible again (in HTML and PDF exports), something that has disappeared
> over time.
+1 for both

1) the :noweb no-export or similar 
2) and the possibility to include source block names in export

- Andreas