[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior
From: |
Leo Alekseyev |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:58:22 -0600 |
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You still have to C-c ' to get back to the full buffer, mind you, but
>>>>>>> that's better, IMO, than changing the behaviour of such a fundamental
>>>>>>> key binding as C-x C-s.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It appears that this bug is Emacs-version dependent: it functions as
>>>>> you describe with 23.2, but the buffer gets buried (with an error
>>>>> message "basic-save-buffer: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil") in
>>>>> 24.0.92. Org mode is the current git HEAD. I tried to step through
>>>>> basic-save-buffer in edebug, but I couldn't catch the error (I'm not
>>>>> very experienced with edebug). Can someone test this on Emacs 24 and
>>>>> confirm what I'm seeing?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am using 24.0.92 and I have no problems at all (just tried right
>>>> now).
>>>>
>>>> One difference, however, could be the window configurations we
>>>> use. Specifically, I have
>>>>
>>>> (setq org-src-window-setup (quote current-window))
>>
>>
>> Yes, this works. It's also a more sensible default. However, it
>> doesn't change the fact that there's a bug, it just switches to a case
>> where the bug isn't triggered :)
>
>
> It is also not triggered by the "other-window" option, which behaves more
> like
> "reorganize-frame" than "current-window" (emacs 24.0.92)
Folks, I still think that the fact that buffer-file-name is not nil is
a bug and should be fixed. If I'm wrong, can someone point out why
this is so?
I have seen many functions that test whether or not a buffer is
visiting a file by checking buffer-file-name. For instance, if I
wanted to enable autosave for org-src buffers, it would break since my
make-auto-save-file-name checks whether a file is being visited.
--Leo
- [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Leo Alekseyev, 2012/01/11
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Eric S Fraga, 2012/01/11
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Andreas Leha, 2012/01/11
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Leo Alekseyev, 2012/01/11
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Leo Alekseyev, 2012/01/11
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Eric S Fraga, 2012/01/12
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Andreas Leha, 2012/01/12
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Leo Alekseyev, 2012/01/12
- Message not available
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior,
Leo Alekseyev <=
- Re: [O] Org-edit-special and C-x C-s strange behavior, Bastien, 2012/01/24