[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening
From: |
François Pinard |
Subject: |
Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 06:49:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Sebastien Vauban"
<address@hidden> writes:
> François Pinard wrote:
>> When using SPC in the Agenda buffer (org-agenda-show-and-scrollup), the
>> LOGBOOK drawer is shown opened, which is not a big problem, yet a
>> slightly annoying one, as I'm rarely interested to see its contents at
>> this stage.
> I don't _think_ this is customizable right now; though, please not[e]
> that RET'ing on en entry from the agenda jumps to the entry, without
> expanding the drawer. Though, it reuses the agenda buffer to do so --
> it's not the same behavior as SPC'ing.
Hello, Sebastien. The manual says, in (org) Drawers:
Sometimes you want to keep information associated with an entry, but
you normally don't want to see it. For this, Org mode has _drawers_.
[...] In order to look inside the drawer, you need to move the cursor
to the drawer line and press <TAB> there.
and I like what the manual says, I would like it to be true. The
/purpose/ of drawers is to keep the information out of sight, unless
explicit action is taken, as stated. I do not see why RET and SPC from
the Agenda would act differently from one another in that respect, nor
why one of them would contradict the definition and spirit of a drawer.
If for some reason it should be an exception, this should be documented
and justified within (org) Agenda commands, which it is currently not.
François
- [O] LOGBOOK opening, François Pinard, 2012/01/11
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, Sebastien Vauban, 2012/01/11
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening,
François Pinard <=
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, Bernt Hansen, 2012/01/15
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, François Pinard, 2012/01/15
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, Bastien, 2012/01/24
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, François Pinard, 2012/01/24
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, Bernt Hansen, 2012/01/24
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, Bastien, 2012/01/25
- Re: [O] LOGBOOK opening, Bernt Hansen, 2012/01/25