[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] TAB from within a text
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] TAB from within a text |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:25:41 -0500 |
François Pinard <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi, everybody.
>
> Writing a longish text for my coworkers this morning, I notice that I do
> not know a quick way for collapsing the whole set of paragraphs I'm
> currently writing, when their header happens to be many screenfuls above
> point. I have to first return to that header and do TAB there. Even
> this return was not evident to me at first. I wrongly thought that `C-c
> C-u' would do it, but it jumps far too much and lands one level higher
> than I expected. Then, /(org)Motion node/ taught me that I could use
> `C-c C-j <up>' to this purpose; which is slightly convoluted to me, as I
> always perceived `C-c C-j' as a kind of sophisticated "reveal".
>
Checking the navigation menu, I thought that
C-c C-p == outline-previous-visible-heading
C-c C-b == org-backward-same-level
C-c C-u == outline-up-heading
(in particular, C-c C-p in this case) would be the more natural choices for
navigation.
C-c C-j == org-goto does a lot more than that - in particular, it is modal
and you have to get out of the mode, e.g. by selecting a location and pressing
<RET>.
> Is it unreasonable for me to hope that, instead of `C-c C-j <up> TAB', a
> mere TAB from within a long text would quickly do what I wanted?
>
It does seem unreasonable to me, looking from the outside in: TAB is
overworked, overloaded and much too smart for its own good, and you are
asking it to be smarter and do more :-) But I wouldn't dismiss it as
impossible: org itself came about from a similar idea applied to outline.el
Whether it's worth it, I don't know: C-c C-p TAB has worked for me and has
seemed painless enough to me so as not to go looking for something "better".
Nick