[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.0
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)] |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:01:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Dave Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Given the following:
>>>
>>> * TODO Some headline
>>> SCHEDULED: <2012-04-05 Thu>
>>>
>>> If I add body text between the headline and the SCHEDULED: line, some
>>> things work, but others don't.
>>
>> See this footnote in the section "8.3.1 Inserting deadlines or
>> schedules" of the manual:
>>
>> (1) The `SCHEDULED' and `DEADLINE' dates are inserted on the line
>> right below the headline. Don't put any text between this line and the
>> headline.
>
> That doesn't make it right.
No, but it makes it clear that users should put SCHEDULED: <...> lines
right after the headline.
> This is a serious usability bug and a newbie trap.
>
> As I mentioned in my report, if some of the commands can handle it,
> there's no reason all of them shouldn't handle it.
> The only other valid interpretation is that those commands that are
> handling it as I expect are broken and they're changing things that
> should really be treated as body text and just happen to look like a
> SCHEDULED line.
Patch welcome.
Or even more useful: write a small function that goes an Org buffer
and spot misformatted subtrees, offering to fix them interactively.
Can you write this?
Thanks,
--
Bastien
- [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Dave Abrahams, 2012/04/05
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Bastien, 2012/04/06
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Dave Abrahams, 2012/04/06
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)],
Bastien <=
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Dave Abrahams, 2012/04/09
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Bastien, 2012/04/09
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Dave Abrahams, 2012/04/09
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Bastien, 2012/04/09
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Dave Abrahams, 2012/04/09
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Bastien, 2012/04/09
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Dave Abrahams, 2012/04/09
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Rainer Stengele, 2012/04/10
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], Bastien, 2012/04/10
- Re: [O] Bug: "SCHEDULED: " positioning is fragile [7.8.06 (release_7.8.06.181.ga481)], John Wiegley, 2012/04/09