[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Sticky agenda status?
From: |
Max Mikhanosha |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Sticky agenda status? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:56:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.3.50 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
At Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:59:37 +0800,
Kyle Machulis wrote:
>
> Just curious if the sticky agenda branch is going to land as a feature
> at some point, or if there was some discussion on what's blocking it
> that I'm missing? There was lots of action last month then silence,
> and it looks like the branch has bitrotted against the trunk now. Was
> kinda looking forward to it as a feature. :)
>
I had merged origin/master into max-sticky-agenda, can you try it out
so that there is more then one person running it? If everything looks
good I'll push it to master on Monday.
So far I had one problem with babel, which appears unrelated to sticky
changes, as org-babel-header-arg-expand seems to be made it into
default value of org-tab-first-hook, and right that function throws
some weird error inside of it.
I simply added
(remove-hook 'org-tab-first-hook 'org-babel-header-arg-expand)
to my org mode initialization.
Regards,
Max