Re: [O] Sticky agenda branch merged

[Rainer Stengele]

Am 17.04.2012 17:32, schrieb Max Mikhanosha:
> Hi Rainer,
>
> At Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:23:00 +0200,
> Rainer Stengele wrote:
> > Am 17.04.2012 14:29, schrieb Max Mikhanosha:
> > > At Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:09:40 +0200,
> > > Rainer Stengele wrote:
> > > > Am 16.04.2012 11:47, schrieb Max Mikhanosha:
> > > > > I had just pushed a merge of max-sticky-agenda branch to master, let
> > > > > me know if there are any problems, also feel free to hack/iterate on
> > > > I see a strange behaviour when clocking in with C-c C-x C-i.
> > > > Sometimes (!) there is no new CLOCK: entry created.
> > > > The TODO state changes as expected, but no new CLOCK: line is created, even 
> > > > when clocking out.
> > > > Looks like this happens when the initial TODO state is set.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe I missed a change in the behaviour?
> > > Rainer, I can't reproduce this, can you give me a few more details?
> > >
> > > 1. Are you doing C-c C-x C-i from agenda, or from an Org File?
> >
> > from org file
> >
> > > 2. I don't understand the "TODO state changes as expected" part, I
> > > thought clock-in command has no effect on todo state, ie it simply
> > > adds CLOCK line to logbook drawer. Is there some extra configuration I
> > > need to change to enable this bit?
> >
> > I have set "org-clock-in-switch-to-state" to "INARBEIT" state in my state 
> > sequence
> >
> > #+SEQ_TODO: TODO INARBEIT WARTEN | MOVED DONE CANCELED DELEGATED
> >
> > As soon as I am in state "INARBEIT" and doing a clockin, the CLOCK: line 
> > appears.
> > > 3. Are sticky agendas enabled?
> >
> > YES!
> > > 4. If its from agenda, and its sticky, is it freshly generated, or was
> > >     it refreshed with "g" or "r" key?
> > it is not from agenda
> > > 5. If its from sticky agenda, can you reproduce it without enabling sticky 
> > > agendas?
> > Let me see: no, problem occurs with or without sticky agendas
> > >
>
> So far this looks to me as its unrelated to sticky changes, could you
> by any chance try commit 3bd1c2e9bff539c94f92f1ec919f8f0f1640f8c0
> which is 1 before sticky merge , and see if same scenario is broken
> there?
>
> The git commands to do it (ignore if your git-fu is strong)
>
> git checkout 3bd1c2e9bff539c94f92f1ec919f8f0f1640f8c0
> .. test ..
> git checkout master
> .. back to normal ..
>
> Regards,
>   Max

Hi Max,

I just tested. The missing CLOCK: entry is unrelated to your merge. It also 
appears in
3bd1c2e9bff539c94f92f1ec919f8f0f1640f8c0
So this must be related to another change.
Can anyone confirm?

Sorry and thanks you for the work on the sticky agendas!

Regards,
Rainer