[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Makefile restructuring
From: |
suvayu ali |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Makefile restructuring |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:22:51 +0200 |
Hi Achim,
Last time when I tested the latest changes, I overlooked something.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 16:34, Achim Gratz <address@hidden> wrote:
> If you don't install org (i.e. run it directly out of the Git worktree),
> that would be:
>
> make compile autoloads info
The above recipe works. But just "make", leaves the working tree without
lisp/org-install.el. From the log I see it explicitly deletes it, but
doesn't generate it again. A subsequent "make autoloads" is required to
get a working org setup. Is this expected behaviour? I thought a simple
make should "cleanly compile Org ELisp files and documentation"?
Thanks for any comments.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Bastien, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, suvayu ali, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Samuel Wales, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring,
suvayu ali <=
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/22
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, suvayu ali, 2012/04/23
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Mike McLean, 2012/04/23
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/24
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Bastien, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Samuel Wales, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Samuel Wales, 2012/04/21
- Re: [O] Makefile restructuring, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/21