[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] how to schedule over a range of dates?
From: |
Detlef Steuer |
Subject: |
Re: [O] how to schedule over a range of dates? |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:05:12 +0200 |
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:28:08 +0530
Mandar Mitra <address@hidden> wrote:
> I understand that "SCHEDULED" is intended to only specify a start date,
> but I'd like to be able to use a range of dates with SCHEDULED, and get
> consistent behaviour in the Agenda view. This helps when I'm looking at
> the Agenda view and trying to find free days to schedule other stuff.
>
> Currently (version 7.8.09), if I have something like
>
> SCHEDULED: <2012-04-21 Sat>--<2012-04-24 Tue>
I use it without the SCHEDULED keyword and it does exactly what I need.
HTH
Detlef
>
> then the agenda view gives me 2 lines of the form:
>
> TODO: Sched. 2x: [#0] <some work>
> TODO: (2/4): [#0] <same work as above>
>
> I have org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry set to t, but
> perhaps I've misunderstood the intention of this variable?
>
> If I leave just the timestamp (no SCHEDULED), then the behaviour is
> almost like what I want, with two exceptions:
>
> 1. Once the end date is past, the item disappears from the agenda
> irrespective of whether I've marked it DONE.
> (I have org-agenda-skip-timestamp-if-done set to nil.)
> This does not happen for a SCHEDULED item (which I have to explicitly
> mark DONE).
>
> 2. (minor) The corresponding line in the agenda view does not have any
> face associated with it, so I can't customise its appearance.
>
> Is there an easy way of achieving something like the following in the
> agenda view?
>
> Sunday 22 April 2012
> TODO: Sched. 2x (or 2/4): [#0] <some work>
> Monday 23 April 2012 W17
> TODO: Sched. 3x (or 3/4): [#0] <same work as above>
>
> And later, if I've left the work not done,
>
> On some future date
> TODO: Sched. Nx (or N/4, or similar): [#0] <same work as above>
>
>
> Haven't found an answer in TFM. Grateful for any pointers.
>
> Thanks,
> Mandar.
>
>