|
From: | Jambunathan K |
Subject: | Re: [O] LaTeX-export to ACM SIG Proceedings format |
Date: | Wed, 25 Apr 2012 03:59:42 +0530 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (windows-nt) |
Karl Voit <address@hidden> writes: > * Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote: >> Karl Voit <address@hidden> writes: >> >>> Maybe it might be a cool idea to work on this template together and >>> publish it on Worg? I can imagine that several people are trying to >>> meet those ACM template requirements ... >> >> This seems like a good idea. Would it be possible to target Nicolas >> Goaziou's experimental LaTeX exporter, instead of the old exporter? > > Since I was using the PDF/LaTeX export just to make quick and dirty > files to send other people or pretty print, I was not aware that > there is another LaTeX exporter. > > What would be the consequence of choosing the new one? This should be obvious. It will make it better. --
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |