[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Google Summer of Code -- 3 Org projects for our first participat
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Google Summer of Code -- 3 Org projects for our first participation! |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:57:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Neil,
Neil Smithline <address@hidden> writes:
> I've run into this problem dealing with the weak presentation of Org Mode
> files on Github. Github uses the Ruby gem org-ruby
> (https://github.com/bdewey/org-ruby) to convert .org files to HTML. I've
> added a feature or two to org-ruby but really feel that trying to
> completely re-implement Org Mode in a Ruby gem is a losing battle.
What will help org-ruby (and github's support of org files) is to
stabilize the syntax of .org files as much as possible. We are
currently working in this direction.
org-ruby's main job is to convert .org files into HTML or textile files.
> If I understand the project correctly, a working iOrg could be used to
> support Github's rendering of .org files. Github could just drop the use of
> org-ruby and use iOrg as an external converter for formatting .org files.
As I understand it, iOrg will convert .org files to HTML using the
internal Org's HTML exporter. I don't see how github could use such
a setup to produce HTML files from Org (unless github runs an Emacs
batch query for exporting HTML... which seems very unlikely - and
wrong by design anyway.
Let's see how iOrg evolves but let's stick to the bugpile for now.
If the list can specifically help about org-ruby issues, let's help!
All best,
> PS: And the answer is "Yes. I am aware that vehemently suggesting a project
> is equivalent to offering to help with it." :-D
Good :)
--
Bastien
Re: [O] Google Summer of Code -- 3 Org projects for our first participation!, Rasmus, 2012/04/24
Re: [O] Google Summer of Code -- 3 Org projects for our first participation!, Richard Riley, 2012/04/24