[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX
From: |
Suvayu Ali |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:19:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01) |
Hi Nicolas,
Your explanations below explains all the gaps in my understanding!
Thanks a lot and apologies for all the confusion.
:)
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:09:02PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Suvayu Ali <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Okay, I do follow this. However, doesn't LaTeX_CLASS determine what
> > goes into the \documentclass{class name} directive?
>
> No. Key in `org-e-latex-class' is just a label. You can have an
> association like:
>
> ("foo" "\\documentclass{article}" ...)
>
> It is here to help you name different configurations.
>
> > If so, does having \begin{frames}..\end{frames} in the exported tex
> > make sense if the documentclass directive says, for example, article?
>
> You can use article, or book document classes along with Beamer, i.e.
> when you want to create handouts for your presentation. This requires to
> load "beamerarticle" package (cf. Beamer documentation).
>
> So, yes it can make sense to call Beamer back-end on an "article"
> documentclass.
>
> > What I'm getting at is, without the LaTeX_CLASS set to beamer, the
> > crucial \documentclass{beamer} directive is missing and the exported
> > LaTeX document won't be compilable[1]. Given the preceding comments are
> > correct, I would then say having a "beamer" class already defined in
> > org-e-beamer will save new users some trouble. Is my analysis valid, or
> > am I grossly wrong?
>
> Like in the LaTeX back-end, if you specify some class, you have to make
> sure it does match an association in `org-e-latex-classes'. Though,
> having a class named "beamer" isn't mandatory: you can have many classes
> named differently and all using internally "\\documentclass{beamer}".
>
> Also, I don't want to automatically modify a defcustom
> (`org-e-latex-classes') once `org-e-beamer' is loaded. It isn't very
> clean, even with careful checks.
>
> `e-beamer' could also default to some header when provided class doesn't
> match, but that looks ugly, too.
>
> > Footnotes:
> >
> > [1] I tried this with the LaTeX_CLASS set to article, and there were
> > errors in the exported pdf.
>
> Because, in that case, your header must contain:
>
> \usepackage{beamerarticle}
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, (continued)
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/12
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/12
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/12
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/12
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/10/12
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Suvayu Ali, 2012/10/12
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/15
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/10/15
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/16
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/10/12
- Re: [O] [New exporter] Wrong export to LaTeX,
Suvayu Ali <=