[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:43:03 +0100 |
On 12 feb. 2013, at 15:04, Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Though I don't want to quantify, here is one data point,
>
> Graphs are wonderful and colorful. The key thing is it's irrelevant.
> How about creating a graph that shows commit to the org-element.el and
> org-e-* files. Then we are talking.
You are really starting to make me angry. No one in this thread has claimed
that Bastien to a major part of the commits or code lines of the parser. This
is a fuzz you are generating all by yourself.
- Carsten
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, (continued)
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Bastien, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Samuel Wales, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Rainer Stengele, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Evan Misshula, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Daniel Clemente, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11