[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Small syntax change for footnote definitions
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Small syntax change for footnote definitions |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:48:30 +0100 |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> Following a thread started by Samuel Wales (see
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/66558), it appears that
> the standard way to include multiple paragraphs in a footnote definition
> is to rely on "\par" LaTeXism.
>
> There are two problems here. Firstly, the parser would have to go out of
> its way to support this trick. Secondly, it isn't very regular wrt Org
> syntax.
>
> I suggest to end a footnote definition at a headline, another footnote
> definition or *two* blank lines.
Patch applied.
As a reminder, it only requires some change if:
1. you used "\par" in the footnote definition: now you can replace it
with a single blank line.
2. you need regular text (i.e. not a headline or another footnote
definition) after the definition: separate definition and text with
two empty lines.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou